Insight I have gained in the last 4 hours:

It is best not to spend time writing absurdities on your blog at 1:40 a.m. when you should be rewriting your memo.

Speaking of absurdities, why should I write the memo if:

1) it makes me want to go jump off a canal or into a canal or at the very least go swimming,

2) I learn more about torts rather than how to write in legalese because I am creating a special formula to show the exact amount of damages I should receive given my pre-existing condition and susceptibility to emotional distress which has been so intentionally inflicted upon me over the past several weeks at this upstanding institution. Of course I can't help think about how I consented to this pain but if I didn't know what I was getting into is it an implied consent that is a legal fiction?,

3) I'm forced to think of Civ Pro and who am I going to sue, the professor or the author of the text and if I do sue the author, which one, Knapp, Crystal or Prince and where am I going to seek jurisdiction if the casebook was published in Austin, Boston, Chicago, New York and the Netherlands?

4) I'm forced to be negligent in writing the memo because a certain professor wants me to figure out what the learned and scholarly judge didn't realize before writing his insightful opinion and

5) I'm unable to seek relief under the Law Student's Immunity Doctrine because it only applies to those who study the law and I clearly haven't put much attention into that and

6) It causes me to testify against my own abilities in red, white and bold italics, on this blog, that one day will be used against me in a court of law and I will have no recourse because I clicked "I agree" .

Writing the memo seems like such a nice, relaxing treat about now.

Good morning.